BLV vs. PCL
BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) and PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLV is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while PCL is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM. BLV is passively managed, while PCL is actively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BLV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PCL.
Performance
BLV vs. PCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLV achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than PCL's 1.46% return.
BLV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- -0.86%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.33%
- 10Y*
- 0.99%
PCL
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLV vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 0.28% | 2.14% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 1.46% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLV and PCL is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLV vs. PCL — Risk / Return Rank
BLV
PCL
BLV vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLV | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLV | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.61 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
BLV vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than PCL's maximum drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLV and PCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLV | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -5.14% | -33.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.14% | -1.49% | -22.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.51% | -1.76% | -7.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility
BLV vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLV | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.15% | 7.89% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 7.89% | +5.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 7.89% | +4.09% |
BLV vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BLV vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison
BLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than PCL's 5.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.80% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 5.31% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BLV and PCL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BLV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.
PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 4.80% for BLV.
BLV is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while PCL is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BLV and 0.25% for PCL.
Find the right allocation for BLV and PCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer