PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLV vs. PCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLV vs. PCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLV achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than PCL's 1.46% return.


BLV

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.09%
YTD
0.28%
6M
-0.86%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
2.02%
5Y*
-3.33%
10Y*
0.99%

PCL

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.51%
YTD
1.46%
6M
0.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLV vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLV
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
0.28%2.14%
PCL
PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF
1.46%2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BLV and PCL is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLV vs. PCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLV
BLV Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PCL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLV vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLVPCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

BLV vs. PCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLVPCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.61

-0.25

Drawdowns

BLV vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than PCL's maximum drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLV and PCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLVPCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.29%

-5.14%

-33.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.14%

-1.49%

-22.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.51%

-1.76%

-7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

Volatility

BLV vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLVPCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.15%

7.89%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

7.89%

+5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.98%

7.89%

+4.09%

BLV vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BLV vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison

BLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than PCL's 5.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLV
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
4.80%4.67%5.09%4.06%4.17%3.37%6.12%3.57%4.07%3.63%4.16%4.37%
PCL
PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF
5.31%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BLV and PCL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BLV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.

PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 4.80% for BLV.

BLV is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while PCL is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BLV and 0.25% for PCL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLV and PCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer