PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUI vs. DIAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUI vs. DIAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) and Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUI achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than DIAL's 1.24% return.


BLUI

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.00%
YTD
3.62%
6M
3.51%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIAL

1D
0.30%
1M
0.91%
YTD
1.24%
6M
0.82%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
5.97%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUI vs. DIAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLUI and DIAL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

0.72

The correlation between BLUI and DIAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUI vs. DIAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUI
BLUI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BLUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLUI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BLUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLUI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DIAL
DIAL Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DIAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIAL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DIAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUI vs. DIAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) and Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLUIDIALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.63

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.85

6.22

+6.63

BLUI vs. DIAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLUI Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the DIAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLUI and DIAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLUI vs. DIAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUI drawdown since its inception was -2.43%, smaller than the maximum DIAL drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUI and DIAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUIDIALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-22.19%

+19.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.43%

-3.34%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.53%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-5.51%

+5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

0.88%

-0.32%

Volatility

BLUI vs. DIAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) is 1.06%, while Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that BLUI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUIDIALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.37%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

3.39%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

4.16%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.90%

7.05%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.90%

7.02%

-3.12%

BLUI vs. DIAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DIAL's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLUI vs. DIAL - Dividend Comparison

BLUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than DIAL's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLUI
Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF
4.70%2.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DIAL
Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF
5.03%4.81%4.67%3.77%3.47%2.46%2.61%3.27%3.56%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLUI and DIAL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIAL has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to BLUI (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLUI dropped -2.43% vs DIAL's -22.19%.

On 1-year performance, BLUI leads with 7.12% vs 5.45% for DIAL. On fees, DIAL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BLUI has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLUI has performed better with a 7.12% return vs 5.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIAL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BLUI.

DIAL has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 4.70% for BLUI.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BLUI and 0.29% for DIAL.

BLUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUI and DIAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer