BLUEX vs. QCGRIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) and QCGRIX (CREF Growth Account Class R3) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, BLUEX returned 1.81% vs 12.11% for QCGRIX. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BLUEX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for QCGRIX.

Performance

BLUEX vs. QCGRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUEX achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than QCGRIX's 3.61% return.

BLUEX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.86%
• 6M: 0.15%
• YTD: -1.50%
• 1Y: 1.81%
• 3Y*: 3.92%
• 5Y*: 0.93%
• 10Y*: 9.81%
• ALL TIME*: 9.35%

QCGRIX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: -0.75%
• 6M: 4.44%
• YTD: 3.61%
• 1Y: 12.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BLUEX vs. QCGRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-1.50%	4.45%	-0.67%
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3	3.61%	14.41%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUEX and QCGRIX is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024	0.25

Return for Risk

BLUEX vs. QCGRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 5
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

QCGRIX

QCGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 12
QCGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
QCGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
QCGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
QCGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
QCGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLUEX vs. QCGRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLUEX	QCGRIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	0.53	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.24	0.85	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.10	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	0.59	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	1.80	-1.59

BLUEX vs. QCGRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLUEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the QCGRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLUEX and QCGRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLUEX vs. QCGRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUEX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, which is greater than QCGRIX's maximum drawdown of -23.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUEX and QCGRIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLUEX	QCGRIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.27%	-23.93%	-30.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.19%	-16.69%	+4.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.55%	-5.82%	+2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.33%	-4.96%	-8.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.56%	5.44%	+0.12%

Volatility

BLUEX vs. QCGRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) is 3.73%, while CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that BLUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCGRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLUEX	QCGRIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	6.82%	-3.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.90%	14.70%	-5.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.88%	18.74%	-7.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.84%	21.18%	-10.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	21.18%	-4.61%

BLUEX vs. QCGRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QCGRIX's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLUEX vs. QCGRIX - Dividend Comparison

BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while QCGRIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.32%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLUEX and QCGRIX in my portfolio?

BLUEX and QCGRIX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLUEX or QCGRIX?

QCGRIX has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to BLUEX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLUEX dropped -54.27% vs QCGRIX's -23.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCGRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.