PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUEX vs. ANWPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUEX vs. ANWPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUEX achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than ANWPX's 7.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BLUEX has underperformed ANWPX with an annualized return of 9.39%, while ANWPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.


BLUEX

1D
-1.34%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-6.58%
6M
-6.15%
1Y
-6.22%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
9.39%

ANWPX

1D
0.11%
1M
5.20%
YTD
7.38%
6M
8.44%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUEX vs. ANWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
-6.58%4.45%7.24%14.35%-14.30%3.22%34.74%35.34%-4.91%27.86%
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
7.38%21.33%16.76%24.63%-25.92%17.64%33.42%30.10%-5.99%28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUEX and ANWPX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 1991

0.75

The correlation between BLUEX and ANWPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.77 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUEX vs. ANWPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUEX
BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ANWPX
ANWPX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ANWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ANWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUEX vs. ANWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLUEXANWPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.67

1.54

-2.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.88

2.22

-3.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.28

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

1.80

-2.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.37

7.57

-8.94

BLUEX vs. ANWPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLUEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the ANWPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLUEX and ANWPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUEXANWPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.67

1.54

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.52

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.76

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.67

-0.18

Drawdowns

BLUEX vs. ANWPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUEX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, roughly equal to the maximum ANWPX drawdown of -52.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUEX and ANWPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUEXANWPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.27%

-52.34%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-11.48%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-17.93%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

-34.45%

+12.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.06%

-34.45%

+5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

0.00%

-8.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-8.11%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

2.72%

+2.13%

Volatility

BLUEX vs. ANWPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) is 3.48%, while American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that BLUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUEXANWPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.92%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

10.79%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

13.39%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.62%

17.21%

-6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

17.83%

-1.24%

BLUEX vs. ANWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ANWPX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLUEX vs. ANWPX - Dividend Comparison

BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than ANWPX's 6.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
6.12%6.57%5.13%5.36%4.16%7.01%4.13%3.67%7.59%5.50%3.86%6.14%
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
0.33%0.31%0.29%0.03%11.84%27.20%25.43%13.71%13.40%0.00%0.00%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLUEX and ANWPX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANWPX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to BLUEX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLUEX dropped -54.27% vs ANWPX's -52.34%.

ANWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUEX and ANWPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer