PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUEX vs. ACIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUEX vs. ACIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUEX achieves a -5.31% return, which is significantly lower than ACIHX's 9.51% return.


BLUEX

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.04%
YTD
-5.31%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
-5.32%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
9.54%

ACIHX

1D
1.13%
1M
8.30%
YTD
9.51%
6M
8.44%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
23.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUEX vs. ACIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
-5.31%4.45%7.24%14.35%-6.49%
ACIHX
American Century Growth Fund G Class
9.51%16.26%27.35%44.64%-6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUEX and ACIHX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between BLUEX and ACIHX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUEX vs. ACIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUEX
BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ACIHX
ACIHX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ACIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUEX vs. ACIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLUEXACIHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.53

1.92

-2.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.68

2.59

-3.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.33

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

1.83

-2.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.06

6.15

-7.21

BLUEX vs. ACIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLUEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the ACIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLUEX and ACIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUEXACIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

1.92

-2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.03

-0.53

Drawdowns

BLUEX vs. ACIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUEX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, which is greater than ACIHX's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUEX and ACIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUEXACIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.27%

-24.00%

-30.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-16.40%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-24.00%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.28%

0.00%

-7.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-4.89%

-8.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

4.87%

-0.05%

Volatility

BLUEX vs. ACIHX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) have volatilities of 3.20% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUEXACIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

3.32%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

11.91%

-4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.92%

15.73%

-5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.60%

21.06%

-10.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

21.06%

-4.48%

BLUEX vs. ACIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIHX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLUEX vs. ACIHX - Dividend Comparison

BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than ACIHX's 14.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACIHX
American Century Growth Fund G Class
14.56%15.95%5.65%4.61%2.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
0.33%0.31%0.29%0.03%11.84%27.20%25.43%13.71%13.40%0.00%0.00%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLUEX and ACIHX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACIHX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to BLUEX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLUEX dropped -54.27% vs ACIHX's -24.00%.

ACIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUEX and ACIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer