BLUC vs. RSSY
BLUC (Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF) and RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLUC charges 0.23%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSSY.
Performance
BLUC vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLUC achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 33.31% return.
BLUC
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.68%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSSY
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 33.31%
- 6M
- 28.93%
- 1Y
- 49.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLUC vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF | 10.68% | 14.03% |
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 33.31% | 7.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLUC and RSSY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLUC vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank
BLUC
RSSY
BLUC vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLUC | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.15 | 0.76 | +1.38 |
Drawdowns
BLUC vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLUC drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUC and RSSY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLUC | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -29.57% | +18.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -7.35% | +5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.14% | — |
Volatility
BLUC vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLUC | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 13.25% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 18.34% | -5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 18.34% | -5.36% |
BLUC vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLUC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLUC vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison
BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than RSSY's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF | 0.51% | 0.46% |
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 1.53% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLUC and RSSY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLUC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLUC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.
RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.51% for BLUC.
They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLUC and 1.04% for RSSY.
Find the right allocation for BLUC and RSSY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer