BLSX vs. CIFG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLSX (Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLSX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.

Performance

BLSX vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLSX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFG

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 94.51%
• YTD: 92.34%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLSX vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLSX Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF	-24.41%	-32.60%
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	92.34%	-42.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BLSX and CIFG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

BLSX vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLSX	CIFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.12	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BLSX	CIFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-71.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.35%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-38.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLSX	CIFG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	203.83%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	203.83%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	203.83%	—

BLSX vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLSX vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLSX nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLSX and CIFG in my portfolio?

BLSX and CIFG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLSX or CIFG?

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLSX or CIFG?

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BLSX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLSX or CIFG?

BLSX and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BLSX and CIFG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BLSX and 0.75% for CIFG.