PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLST vs. USTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLST vs. USTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLST achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than USTB's 1.19% return.


BLST

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USTB

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.58%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLST vs. USTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLST
Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF
0.25%2.88%
USTB
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
1.19%2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BLST and USTB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLST vs. USTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLST

USTB
USTB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
USTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTB Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
USTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLST vs. USTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLST vs. USTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLSTUSTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

1.73

-0.23

Drawdowns

BLST vs. USTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLST drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum USTB drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLST and USTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLSTUSTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-5.32%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.04%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-0.66%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

Volatility

BLST vs. USTB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLSTUSTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21%

1.22%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.21%

2.01%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.21%

2.01%

+0.20%

BLST vs. USTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than USTB's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLST vs. USTB - Dividend Comparison

BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than USTB's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLST
Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF
3.38%2.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USTB
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
4.58%4.62%5.05%4.49%2.54%1.84%2.59%2.69%2.32%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLST and USTB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLST is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLST is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for USTB.

USTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.38% for BLST.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLST and 0.34% for USTB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLST and USTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer