PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLST vs. SCHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLST vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLST achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than SCHO's 0.42% return.


BLST

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHO

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.78%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
1.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLST vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLST and SCHO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.77

BLST vs. SCHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLST
SCHO

Financial Services

100.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BLST
100.0%
SCHO
0.2%

Basic Materials

BLST

-

SCHO

-

Communication Services

BLST

-

SCHO
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BLST

-

SCHO

-

Consumer Defensive

BLST

-

SCHO

-

Energy

BLST

-

SCHO

-

Healthcare

BLST

-

SCHO

-

Industrials

BLST

-

SCHO

-

Real Estate

BLST

-

SCHO

-

Technology

BLST

-

SCHO
1.1%

Utilities

BLST

-

SCHO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLST vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLST

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLST vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLST vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLSTSCHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.99

+0.51

Drawdowns

BLST vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLST drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum SCHO drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLST and SCHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLSTSCHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-5.69%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.27%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-0.61%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

Volatility

BLST vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLSTSCHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21%

1.37%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.21%

1.98%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.21%

1.56%

+0.65%

BLST vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BLST vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than SCHO's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLST
Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF
3.38%2.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.91%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLST and SCHO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLST.

SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.38% for BLST.

BLST is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SCHO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLST and 0.03% for SCHO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLST and SCHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer