PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLSH vs. FIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BLSH vs. FIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bullish (BLSH) and Figma, Inc (FIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLSH achieves a -42.46% return, which is significantly lower than FIG's -34.92% return.


BLSH

1D
-3.54%
1M
-14.78%
6M
-27.85%
YTD
-42.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

FIG

1D
2.36%
1M
13.96%
6M
-6.17%
YTD
-34.92%
1Y
-80.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-71.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.57M$33.92M$47.68M
$427.54M$501.94M$462.44M

BLSH vs. FIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLSH
Bullish
-42.46%-57.92%
FIG
Figma, Inc
-34.92%-57.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BLSH and FIG is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLSH:

$3.30B

FIG:

$11.86B

EPS

BLSH:

-$6.91

FIG:

-$2.88

PS Ratio

BLSH:

0.01

FIG:

10.66

PB Ratio

BLSH:

1.24

FIG:

8.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLSH:

$216.53B

FIG:

$1.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLSH:

$45.04M

FIG:

$926.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

BLSH:

-$446.11M

FIG:

-$1.43B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLSH vs. FIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLSH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FIG
FIG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLSH vs. FIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bullish (BLSH) and Figma, Inc (FIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLSHFIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

BLSH vs. FIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLSH vs. FIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLSH drawdown since its inception was -75.79%, smaller than the maximum FIG drawdown of -86.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSH and FIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLSHFIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.79%

-86.20%

+10.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.79%

-80.07%

+4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.16%

-69.85%

+15.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.65%

Volatility

BLSH vs. FIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLSHFIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.92%

93.89%

-10.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.92%

93.89%

-10.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.92%

93.89%

-10.97%

Dividends

BLSH vs. FIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLSH nor FIG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BLSH vs. FIG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bullish and Figma, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BLSH vs. FIG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bullish and Figma, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BLSH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bullish reported a gross profit of 17.78M and revenue of 51.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Figma, Inc reported a gross profit of 264.77M and revenue of 333.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.4%.

BLSH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bullish reported an operating income of -57.85M and revenue of 51.81B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.1%.

FIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Figma, Inc reported an operating income of -137.40M and revenue of 333.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.2%.

BLSH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bullish reported a net income of -581.71M and revenue of 51.81B, resulting in a net margin of -1.1%.

FIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Figma, Inc reported a net income of -142.40M and revenue of 333.44M, resulting in a net margin of -42.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLSH and FIG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLSH and FIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer