BLSH vs. FIG
Compare and contrast key facts about Bullish (BLSH) and Figma, Inc (FIG).
Performance
BLSH vs. FIG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BLSH vs. FIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLSH Bullish | -7.39% | -44.31% |
FIG Figma, Inc | -45.36% | -54.38% |
Fundamentals
BLSH:
$5.29B
FIG:
$10.44B
BLSH:
-$5.33
FIG:
-$2.64
BLSH:
0.03
FIG:
9.61
BLSH:
1.64
FIG:
6.91
BLSH:
$180.65B
FIG:
$1.06B
BLSH:
$137.89M
FIG:
$870.26M
BLSH:
-$672.18M
FIG:
-$1.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLSH achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly higher than FIG's -45.36% return.
BLSH
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -42.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIG
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- -30.28%
- YTD
- -45.36%
- 6M
- -59.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLSH vs. FIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bullish (BLSH) and Figma, Inc (FIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLSH | FIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.80 | -1.06 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between BLSH and FIG is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BLSH vs. FIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLSH nor FIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BLSH vs. FIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLSH drawdown since its inception was -66.64%, smaller than the maximum FIG drawdown of -83.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSH and FIG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLSH | FIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.64% | -83.48% | +16.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.01% | -83.26% | +30.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.41% | -63.78% | +25.37% |
Volatility
BLSH vs. FIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BLSH | FIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.85% | 87.65% | -5.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.85% | 87.65% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.85% | 87.65% | -5.80% |
Financials
BLSH vs. FIG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bullish and Figma, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities