BLSG vs. USFR
BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BLSG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. BLSG is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. BLSG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
BLSG vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLSG achieves a -58.79% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.60% return.
BLSG
- 1D
- -15.77%
- 1M
- -55.27%
- YTD
- -58.79%
- 6M
- -73.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
BLSG vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -58.79% | -60.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.60% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLSG and USFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLSG vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
BLSG
USFR
BLSG vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLSG | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 9.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 1.60 | -2.26 |
Drawdowns
BLSG vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLSG drawdown since its inception was -83.67%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSG and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLSG | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.67% | -1.36% | -82.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.52% | 0.00% | -83.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.12% | -0.16% | -59.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
BLSG vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLSG | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 145.44% | 0.27% | +145.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.44% | 0.40% | +145.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.44% | 0.81% | +144.63% |
BLSG vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLSG vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
BLSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLSG and USFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BLSG.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for BLSG.
BLSG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BLSG and 0.15% for USFR.
Find the right allocation for BLSG and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer