BLSG vs. NRGU
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).
BLSG and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLSG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Oct 27, 2025. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019.
Performance
BLSG vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BLSG vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -24.60% | -60.00% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 168.34% | -7.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLSG achieves a -24.60% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 168.34% return.
BLSG
- 1D
- 16.32%
- 1M
- 22.28%
- YTD
- -24.60%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRGU
- 1D
- -5.28%
- 1M
- 54.17%
- YTD
- 168.34%
- 6M
- 128.96%
- 1Y
- 92.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BLSG vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BLSG vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
BLSG
NRGU
BLSG vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLSG | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | 0.81 | -1.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between BLSG and NRGU is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BLSG vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLSG nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BLSG vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLSG drawdown since its inception was -83.67%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSG and NRGU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLSG | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.67% | -57.50% | -26.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.84% | -7.45% | -62.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.40% | -25.41% | -31.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 27.10% | — |
Volatility
BLSG vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BLSG | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 48.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.51% | 87.53% | +58.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.51% | 86.64% | +59.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.51% | 86.64% | +59.87% |