PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLPIX vs. ULPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLPIX vs. ULPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLPIX achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than ULPIX's 12.45% return. Over the past 10 years, BLPIX has underperformed ULPIX with an annualized return of 12.93%, while ULPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.82% annualized return.


BLPIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
7.21%
6M
5.86%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
12.93%

ULPIX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
12.45%
6M
9.57%
1Y
38.29%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
16.29%
10Y*
22.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLPIX vs. ULPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLPIX
ProFunds Bull Investor Fund
7.21%15.01%20.24%24.13%-19.81%23.73%16.04%28.97%-6.09%19.51%
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
12.45%25.47%38.03%45.59%-39.16%59.28%19.12%62.17%-15.02%42.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BLPIX and ULPIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

1.00

The correlation between BLPIX and ULPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLPIX vs. ULPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLPIX
BLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ULPIX
ULPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ULPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ULPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLPIX vs. ULPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLPIXULPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.10

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

8.87

+0.78

BLPIX vs. ULPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the ULPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLPIX and ULPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLPIX vs. ULPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLPIX drawdown since its inception was -57.98%, smaller than the maximum ULPIX drawdown of -89.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLPIX and ULPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLPIXULPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.98%

-89.68%

+31.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-18.30%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

-36.59%

+17.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-46.92%

+20.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.93%

-59.41%

+25.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-6.89%

+3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-33.77%

+19.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

4.33%

-2.24%

Volatility

BLPIX vs. ULPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX) is 4.86%, while ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that BLPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLPIXULPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

9.75%

-4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

19.76%

-9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

25.04%

-12.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

34.12%

-17.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

35.47%

-17.72%

BLPIX vs. ULPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLPIX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ULPIX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLPIX vs. ULPIX - Dividend Comparison

BLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than ULPIX's 8.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BLPIX
ProFunds Bull Investor Fund
1.47%1.58%0.00%0.03%0.98%6.68%5.79%1.64%0.62%
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
8.10%9.11%0.00%0.02%10.36%5.62%12.74%0.42%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, BLPIX and ULPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ULPIX has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to BLPIX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLPIX dropped -57.98% vs ULPIX's -89.68%.

BLPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLPIX and ULPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer