PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLPAX vs. PUDZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLPAX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLPAX achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BLPAX has outperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.


BLPAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.65%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.21%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
9.17%

PUDZX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
12.42%
6M
12.79%
1Y
20.93%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLPAX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
7.24%16.64%11.30%13.87%-13.60%13.87%13.16%19.53%-4.59%16.71%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
12.42%13.40%8.61%3.26%-2.76%18.49%4.84%16.29%-9.20%6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BLPAX and PUDZX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between BLPAX and PUDZX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLPAX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLPAX
BLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PUDZX
PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLPAX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLPAXPUDZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.94

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

4.01

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.55

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

6.20

-3.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.23

23.29

-11.07

BLPAX vs. PUDZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the PUDZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLPAX and PUDZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLPAXPUDZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.94

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.75

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.70

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.54

+0.38

Drawdowns

BLPAX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLPAX drawdown since its inception was -23.21%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLPAX and PUDZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLPAXPUDZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.21%

-21.53%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-3.56%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.62%

-8.20%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.65%

-17.98%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.21%

-21.53%

-1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-2.64%

+2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-5.26%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

0.95%

+0.67%

Volatility

BLPAX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 1.93%. This indicates that BLPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLPAXPUDZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

1.93%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

6.09%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

7.52%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.41%

10.54%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.83%

9.70%

+1.13%

BLPAX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLPAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLPAX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison

BLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than PUDZX's 7.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
5.44%5.83%3.59%2.30%6.01%4.97%2.56%3.83%4.69%3.48%3.66%3.69%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
7.77%8.93%6.67%3.66%9.10%13.00%4.94%3.40%2.14%2.10%1.39%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLPAX and PUDZX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLPAX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to PUDZX (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLPAX dropped -23.21% vs PUDZX's -21.53%.

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLPAX and PUDZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer