PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLPAX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLPAX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLPAX achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 9.13% return.


BLPAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.65%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.21%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
9.17%

FRGAX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.13%
6M
9.90%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLPAX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
7.24%16.64%11.30%13.87%-0.86%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
9.13%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BLPAX and FRGAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.96

The correlation between BLPAX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLPAX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLPAX
BLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLPAX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLPAXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.56

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

3.63

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.48

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

3.33

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.23

14.92

-2.70

BLPAX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLPAX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLPAXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.56

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.53

-0.62

Drawdowns

BLPAX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLPAX drawdown since its inception was -23.21%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLPAX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLPAXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.21%

-11.77%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-7.03%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.62%

-11.77%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-1.59%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.57%

+0.05%

Volatility

BLPAX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) have volatilities of 2.65% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLPAXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.75%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

7.21%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

9.04%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.41%

10.32%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.83%

10.32%

+0.51%

BLPAX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLPAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLPAX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

BLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than FRGAX's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
5.44%5.83%3.59%2.30%6.01%4.97%2.56%3.83%4.69%3.48%3.66%3.69%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.84%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BLPAX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRGAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to BLPAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLPAX dropped -23.21% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLPAX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer