BLK vs. ATD.TO
BLK (BlackRock, Inc.) and ATD.TO (Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.) are both stocks. BLK operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while ATD.TO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, BLK returned 14.55%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for ATD.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLK vs. ATD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BLK is traded in USD, while ATD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLK achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly lower than ATD.TO's 10.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BLK has outperformed ATD.TO with an annualized return of 14.55%, while ATD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.06% annualized return.
BLK
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -2.50%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- 6.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
ATD.TO
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 15.26%
- 1Y
- 13.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
BLK vs. ATD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLK BlackRock, Inc. | -2.50% | 6.55% | 29.29% | 17.86% | -20.40% | 29.39% | 47.21% | 31.87% | -21.59% | 38.20% |
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 10.42% | -0.37% | -4.94% | 35.48% | 6.47% | 22.90% | 8.45% | 28.38% | -3.87% | 14.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLK and ATD.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.21 |
The correlation between BLK and ATD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BLK:
$170.28B
ATD.TO:
CA$77.94B
BLK:
$38.89
ATD.TO:
$2.90
BLK:
26.53
ATD.TO:
20.80
BLK:
6.46
ATD.TO:
0.77
BLK:
3.00
ATD.TO:
3.58
BLK:
$25.71B
ATD.TO:
$73.29B
BLK:
$15.21B
ATD.TO:
$13.89B
BLK:
$9.79B
ATD.TO:
$6.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLK vs. ATD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BLK
ATD.TO
BLK vs. ATD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLK | ATD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 0.98 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | 1.92 | -1.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLK vs. ATD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLK drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, roughly equal to the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLK and ATD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLK | ATD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.36% | -58.96% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.45% | -13.33% | -9.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.74% | -26.59% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.90% | -26.59% | -17.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.90% | -38.09% | -5.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.80% | -3.61% | -9.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.93% | -10.39% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.05% | 6.83% | +3.22% |
Volatility
BLK vs. ATD.TO - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) at 5.92%. This indicates that BLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLK | ATD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 5.92% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.59% | 18.02% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.90% | 25.57% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.76% | 24.26% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.75% | 25.02% | +2.73% |
Dividends
BLK vs. ATD.TO - Dividend Comparison
BLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than ATD.TO's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 0.97% | 1.07% | 0.90% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.69% | 1.06% | 1.15% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 0.72% |
BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 2.12% | 1.95% | 1.99% | 2.46% | 2.75% | 1.80% | 2.01% | 2.63% | 3.08% | 1.95% | 2.41% | 2.56% |
Financials
BLK vs. ATD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock, Inc. and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BLK vs. ATD.TO - Profitability Comparison
BLK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.51B and revenue of 6.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.
ATD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.24B and revenue of 21.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
BLK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 6.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.
ATD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
BLK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 6.77B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.
ATD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a net income of 757.20M and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLK and ATD.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BLK and ATD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer