BLFS vs. ABNB
BLFS (BioLife Solutions, Inc.) and ABNB (Airbnb, Inc.) are both stocks. BLFS operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while ABNB operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, BLFS returned -3.73%/yr vs -2.39%/yr for ABNB. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLFS vs. ABNB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLFS achieves a 12.70% return, which is significantly higher than ABNB's -1.57% return.
BLFS
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 29.21%
- YTD
- 12.70%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- -3.73%
- 10Y*
- 32.86%
ABNB
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 0.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- -2.39%
- 10Y*
- —
BLFS vs. ABNB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLFS BioLife Solutions, Inc. | 12.70% | -6.86% | 59.75% | -10.71% | -51.17% | -6.57% | -1.43% |
ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | -1.57% | 3.28% | -3.47% | 59.23% | -48.65% | 13.41% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLFS and ABNB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020 | 0.36 |
Fundamentals
BLFS:
$1.34B
ABNB:
$81.22B
BLFS:
-$0.22
ABNB:
$4.06
BLFS:
13.27
ABNB:
6.54
BLFS:
3.61
ABNB:
10.64
BLFS:
$99.77M
ABNB:
$12.65B
BLFS:
$63.83M
ABNB:
$10.49B
BLFS:
-$8.16M
ABNB:
$2.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLFS vs. ABNB — Risk / Return Rank
BLFS
ABNB
BLFS vs. ABNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) and Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLFS | ABNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.03 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.02 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 0.05 | +1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLFS | ABNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 0.02 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | -0.05 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | -0.03 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
BLFS vs. ABNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLFS drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than ABNB's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLFS and ABNB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLFS | ABNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -61.96% | -37.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.96% | -21.54% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.06% | -37.16% | -25.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.14% | -60.19% | -24.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.54% | -38.39% | -42.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.23% | -36.13% | -53.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.11% | 10.00% | +7.11% |
Volatility
BLFS vs. ABNB - Volatility Comparison
BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) has a higher volatility of 14.92% compared to Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) at 7.89%. This indicates that BLFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABNB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLFS | ABNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.92% | 7.89% | +7.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.32% | 22.51% | +10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.76% | 29.23% | +16.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.25% | 43.81% | +22.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.04% | 46.04% | +22.00% |
Dividends
BLFS vs. ABNB - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLFS nor ABNB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BLFS vs. ABNB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BioLife Solutions, Inc. and Airbnb, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BLFS vs. ABNB - Profitability Comparison
BLFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BioLife Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.50M and revenue of 27.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.
ABNB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbnb, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.10B and revenue of 2.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.3%.
BLFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BioLife Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.00K and revenue of 27.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.
ABNB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbnb, Inc. reported an operating income of 86.00M and revenue of 2.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
BLFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BioLife Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19M and revenue of 27.50M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
ABNB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbnb, Inc. reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 2.68B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLFS and ABNB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLFS has higher volatility (14.92%) compared to ABNB (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLFS dropped -99.80% vs ABNB's -61.96%.
BLFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLFS and ABNB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer