BLFS vs. AVGO
BLFS (BioLife Solutions, Inc.) and AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) are both stocks. BLFS operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while AVGO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BLFS returned 30.38%/yr vs 40.82%/yr for AVGO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLFS vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLFS achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than AVGO's 11.37% return. Over the past 10 years, BLFS has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 30.38%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 40.82% annualized return.
BLFS
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 7.66%
- 6M
- 16.89%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- -8.87%
- 10Y*
- 30.38%
AVGO
- 1D
- -3.98%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 41.00%
- 3Y*
- 64.86%
- 5Y*
- 54.35%
- 10Y*
- 40.82%
BLFS vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLFS BioLife Solutions, Inc. | 16.21% | -6.86% | 59.75% | -10.71% | -51.17% | -6.57% | 146.54% | 34.50% | 100.50% | 272.60% |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 11.37% | 50.63% | 110.49% | 104.18% | -13.27% | 56.48% | 44.88% | 29.05% | 2.18% | 48.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLFS and AVGO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009 | 0.16 |
The correlation between BLFS and AVGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BLFS:
$1.37B
AVGO:
$1.83T
BLFS:
-$0.21
AVGO:
$6.01
BLFS:
13.76
AVGO:
24.83
BLFS:
3.72
AVGO:
21.35
BLFS:
$99.77M
AVGO:
$75.47B
BLFS:
$63.83M
AVGO:
$50.53B
BLFS:
-$8.16M
AVGO:
$42.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLFS vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank
BLFS
AVGO
BLFS vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLFS | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 1.44 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 3.04 | -1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLFS vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLFS drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLFS and AVGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLFS | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -48.30% | -51.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.96% | -28.67% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.82% | -41.15% | -14.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.14% | -41.15% | -43.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.14% | -48.30% | -36.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.93% | -20.12% | -59.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.22% | -8.04% | -81.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.89% | 13.53% | +3.36% |
Volatility
BLFS vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) is 12.49%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that BLFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLFS | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.49% | 14.74% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.73% | 34.43% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.24% | 47.03% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.30% | 43.81% | +22.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.04% | 39.64% | +26.40% |
Dividends
BLFS vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison
BLFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.66% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
BLFS BioLife Solutions, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BLFS vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BioLife Solutions, Inc. and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BLFS vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison
BLFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BioLife Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.50M and revenue of 27.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.
AVGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
BLFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BioLife Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.00K and revenue of 27.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.
AVGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.
BLFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BioLife Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19M and revenue of 27.50M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
AVGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLFS and AVGO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGO has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to BLFS (12.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLFS dropped -99.80% vs AVGO's -48.30%.
AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLFS and AVGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer