BLFS vs. AVGO

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BLFS having a -10.29% return and AVGO slightly higher at -9.92%. Over the past 10 years, BLFS has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 29.28%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 36.26% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BLFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLFS and AVGO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BLFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.

The maximum BLFS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLFS and AVGO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) has a higher volatility of 20.89% compared to Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) at 14.08%. This indicates that BLFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BioLife Solutions, Inc. and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.