BLDG vs. XLRI
BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLDG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
BLDG vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLDG achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 6.71% return.
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 11.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.99%
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLDG vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 9.76% | 1.07% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.71% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDG and XLRI is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDG vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
BLDG
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLDG vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLDG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLDG vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.25% | -7.12% | -20.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.54% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.15% | -1.65% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | — | — |
Volatility
BLDG vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 10.99% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 10.99% | +4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 10.99% | +4.57% |
BLDG vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLDG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLDG vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, less than XLRI's 12.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.35% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.24% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDG and XLRI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.24%, compared with 5.35% for BLDG.
BLDG is categorized as REIT, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BLDG and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for BLDG and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer