BLDG vs. XLRI
BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLDG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
BLDG vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLDG achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 6.95% return.
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- 12.00%
- 1Y
- 12.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLDG vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 12.00% | 1.07% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.95% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDG and XLRI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDG vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
BLDG
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLDG vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLDG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLDG vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.25% | -7.12% | -20.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.82% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -1.61% | -7.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | — | — |
Volatility
BLDG vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 11.20% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 11.20% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 11.20% | +4.33% |
BLDG vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLDG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLDG vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than XLRI's 13.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.25% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.71% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDG and XLRI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.71%, compared with 5.25% for BLDG.
BLDG is categorized as REIT, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BLDG and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for BLDG and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer