BLDG vs. XLRI
BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLDG returned 18.58% vs 10.04% for XLRI. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BLDG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
BLDG vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLDG achieves a 14.70% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 7.92% return.
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.19%
XLRI
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 10.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $88.64K | $78.98K | $590.59K | |
| $67.65K | $68.45K | $64.14K |
BLDG vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 14.70% | 1.07% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 7.92% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDG and XLRI is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.68 |
The correlation between BLDG and XLRI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDG vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
BLDG
XLRI
BLDG vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLDG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.17 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 1.42 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 4.95 | +1.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLDG vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.25% | -7.12% | -20.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -7.12% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.11% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -1.54% | -7.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.03% | +0.83% |
Volatility
BLDG vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) at 3.34%. This indicates that BLDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 3.34% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | 8.74% | +0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.53% | 11.02% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 11.10% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 11.10% | +4.40% |
BLDG vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLDG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLDG vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, less than XLRI's 14.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.12% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.37% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDG and XLRI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLDG has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to XLRI (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDG dropped -27.25% vs XLRI's -7.12%.
On 1-year performance, BLDG leads with 18.58% vs 10.04% for XLRI. On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLRI has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 18.58% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 14.37%, compared with 5.12% for BLDG.
BLDG is categorized as REIT, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BLDG and 0.35% for XLRI.
BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLDG and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer