BLCV vs. BINC
BLCV (Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BLCV returned 18.17%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for BINC. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLCV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.
Performance
BLCV vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLCV achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 1.29% return.
BLCV
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BINC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLCV vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF | 6.47% | 19.96% | 12.63% | 14.56% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1.29% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLCV and BINC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLCV vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
BLCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BINC
BLCV vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLCV | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.48 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.06 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 8.04 | +0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLCV vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLCV drawdown since its inception was -13.44%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCV and BINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLCV | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.44% | -2.69% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -2.69% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.44% | -2.69% | -10.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -0.10% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -0.36% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 0.69% | +1.77% |
Volatility
BLCV vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.58%. This indicates that BLCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLCV | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 0.58% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 1.88% | +7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 2.30% | +9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 2.99% | +9.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 2.99% | +9.82% |
BLCV vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLCV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLCV vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
BLCV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.84% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% |
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF | 1.01% | 1.37% | 1.63% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLCV and BINC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLCV has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to BINC (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCV dropped -13.44% vs BINC's -2.69%.
On 3-year performance, BLCV leads with 18.17% vs 7.12% for BINC. On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BLCV has performed better with a 18.17% return vs 7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BLCV.
BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 1.01% for BLCV.
BLCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BINC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BLCV and 0.40% for BINC.
BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLCV and BINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer