BLCR vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLCR returned 48.53% vs 72.28% for CNAV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLCR charges 0.36%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

BLCR vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCR achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 45.64% return.

BLCR

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 6.36%
• YTD: 19.96%
• 6M: 21.52%
• 1Y: 48.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNAV

• 1D: 4.58%
• 1M: 20.83%
• YTD: 45.64%
• 6M: 45.55%
• 1Y: 72.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCR vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	19.96%	30.93%	2.19%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	45.64%	16.80%	6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCR and CNAV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	0.85

The correlation between BLCR and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BLCR vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 89
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 85
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCR vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLCR	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	2.90	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.12	3.60	+0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.48	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.86	5.74	-0.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.10	24.61	-1.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLCR vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCR Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is comparable to the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCR and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLCR	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14	2.90	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.91	1.59	+0.32

Drawdowns

BLCR vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCR drawdown since its inception was -21.29%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCR and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCR	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.29%	-30.06%	+8.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-12.97%	+2.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-5.43%	+3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	3.02%	-0.86%

Volatility

BLCR vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) is 4.43%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that BLCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLCR	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	12.29%	-7.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.25%	21.03%	-8.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.55%	25.09%	-9.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	27.19%	-9.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	27.19%	-9.71%

BLCR vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCR has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCR vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCR and CNAV in my portfolio?

BLCR and CNAV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLCR or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to BLCR (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCR dropped -21.29% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, BLCR or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.28% vs 48.53% for BLCR. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, BLCR has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLCR or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.28% return vs 48.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCR or CNAV?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLCR or CNAV?

BLCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between BLCR and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for BLCR and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.