BLCR vs. BMED

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) and BMED (Future Health ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BMED is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLCR returned 35.01% vs 25.01% for BMED. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BLCR charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BMED.

Performance

BLCR vs. BMED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) and Future Health ETF (BMED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCR achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than BMED's 2.13% return.

BLCR

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: 0.40%
• 6M: 12.74%
• YTD: 17.25%
• 1Y: 35.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.36%

BMED

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -2.10%
• 6M: -1.11%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 1Y: 25.01%
• 3Y*: 8.90%
• 5Y*: 0.33%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	$17.79M	$18.82M	$32.47M
BMED Future Health ETF	$43.65K	$67.75K	$63.60K

BLCR vs. BMED - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	17.25%	30.93%	17.07%	13.54%
BMED Future Health ETF	2.13%	21.79%	1.55%	16.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCR and BMED is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.52

The correlation between BLCR and BMED shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BLCR vs. BMED - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLCR	BMED
Technology	36.6%	-
Industrials	13.7%	-
Communication Services	13.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	-
Financial Services	9.7%	-
Healthcare	9.7%	100.0%
Basic Materials	2.3%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Energy	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	1.5%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BLCR vs. BMED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 84
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

BMED

BMED Risk / Return Rank: 55
BMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BMED Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BMED Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLCR vs. BMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) and Future Health ETF (BMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLCR	BMED	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.59	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.37	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	1.69	+1.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.68	3.89	+9.79

BLCR vs. BMED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCR Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the BMED Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCR and BMED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLCR vs. BMED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCR drawdown since its inception was -21.29%, smaller than the maximum BMED drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCR and BMED.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCR	BMED	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.29%	-36.44%	+15.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-14.85%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.30%	-4.31%	+2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-18.74%	+16.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	6.44%	-3.87%

Volatility

BLCR vs. BMED - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Future Health ETF (BMED) at 4.54%. This indicates that BLCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLCR	BMED	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	4.54%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.89%	12.12%	+1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.25%	15.84%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.73%	17.56%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.73%	17.76%	-0.03%

BLCR vs. BMED - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCR has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than BMED's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCR vs. BMED - Dividend Comparison

BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than BMED's 0.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.29%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
BMED Future Health ETF	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCR and BMED in my portfolio?

BLCR and BMED have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLCR or BMED?

BLCR has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to BMED (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCR dropped -21.29% vs BMED's -36.44%.

Which ETF is better, BLCR or BMED?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 35.01% vs 25.01% for BMED. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, BMED has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLCR or BMED?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 35.01% return vs 25.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCR or BMED?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BMED.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLCR or BMED?

BLCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.26% for BMED.

What is the main difference between BLCR and BMED?

BLCR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BMED is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for BLCR and 0.85% for BMED.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.