BLCR vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLCR returned 41.08% vs 11.63% for BDGS. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLCR charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

BLCR vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCR achieves a 16.77% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.21% return.

BLCR

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: 16.77%
• 6M: 15.78%
• 1Y: 41.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 4.21%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 11.63%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCR vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	16.77%	30.93%	17.07%	13.54%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.21%	10.61%	19.07%	9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCR and BDGS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.77

The correlation between BLCR and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLCR vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLCR	BDGS
Technology	34.3%	37.4%
Communication Services	14.6%	16.6%
Industrials	13.7%	6.6%
Financial Services	12.5%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	10.9%
Healthcare	7.6%	7.5%
Energy	2.2%	2.6%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.5%
Utilities	1.6%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.1%
Real Estate	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

BLCR vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 82
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCR vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLCR	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	1.84	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	2.75	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.37	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	2.90	+1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.20	12.72	+5.48

BLCR vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCR Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCR and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLCR vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCR drawdown since its inception was -21.29%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCR and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCR	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.29%	-9.12%	-12.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-4.03%	-6.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-2.17%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-0.66%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	0.92%	+1.34%

Volatility

BLCR vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.30%. This indicates that BLCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLCR	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.32%	2.30%	+4.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.18%	5.17%	+8.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.45%	6.38%	+10.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.67%	8.22%	+9.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.67%	8.22%	+9.45%

BLCR vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCR has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCR vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.29%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCR and BDGS in my portfolio?

BLCR and BDGS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLCR or BDGS?

BLCR has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to BDGS (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCR dropped -21.29% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, BLCR or BDGS?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 41.08% vs 11.63% for BDGS. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLCR or BDGS?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 41.08% return vs 11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCR or BDGS?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLCR or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.29% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between BLCR and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for BLCR and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.