PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLCO vs. TEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BLCO vs. TEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bausch + Lomb Corp (BLCO) and Tempus AI, Inc (TEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCO achieves a -12.94% return, which is significantly higher than TEM's -19.54% return.


BLCO

1D
-0.73%
1M
-8.77%
YTD
-12.94%
6M
-12.32%
1Y
29.30%
3Y*
-6.60%
5Y*
10Y*

TEM

1D
-4.25%
1M
-14.87%
YTD
-19.54%
6M
-36.58%
1Y
-23.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCO vs. TEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BLCO
Bausch + Lomb Corp
-12.94%-5.43%19.68%
TEM
Tempus AI, Inc
-19.54%74.91%-16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCO and TEM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2024

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLCO:

$5.28B

TEM:

$8.50B

EPS

BLCO:

-$0.62

TEM:

-$1.73

PS Ratio

BLCO:

1.01

TEM:

6.11

PB Ratio

BLCO:

0.83

TEM:

20.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLCO:

$5.20B

TEM:

$1.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLCO:

$3.58B

TEM:

$977.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

BLCO:

$585.00M

TEM:

-$233.09M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bausch + Lomb Corp

Tempus AI, Inc

Return for Risk

BLCO vs. TEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCO
BLCO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TEM
TEM Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEM Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCO vs. TEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bausch + Lomb Corp (BLCO) and Tempus AI, Inc (TEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLCOTEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.98

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

-0.40

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

-0.68

+4.64

BLCO vs. TEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the TEM Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCO and TEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLCOTEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

-0.37

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

0.09

-0.27

Drawdowns

BLCO vs. TEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCO drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, smaller than the maximum TEM drawdown of -58.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCO and TEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLCOTEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.07%

-58.99%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.05%

-58.96%

+38.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.16%

-53.99%

+24.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.71%

-31.76%

+10.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.41%

34.58%

-27.17%

Volatility

BLCO vs. TEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bausch + Lomb Corp (BLCO) is 4.75%, while Tempus AI, Inc (TEM) has a volatility of 16.88%. This indicates that BLCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLCOTEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

16.88%

-12.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.57%

42.91%

-23.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.16%

63.34%

-32.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.97%

98.43%

-58.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.97%

98.43%

-58.46%

Dividends

BLCO vs. TEM - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLCO nor TEM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BLCO vs. TEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bausch + Lomb Corp and Tempus AI, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.24B
348.12M
(BLCO) Total Revenue
(TEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BLCO vs. TEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bausch + Lomb Corp and Tempus AI, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
99.9%
71.0%
Portfolio components
BLCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bausch + Lomb Corp reported a gross profit of 1.24B and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.9%.

TEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tempus AI, Inc reported a gross profit of 247.16M and revenue of 348.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.0%.

BLCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bausch + Lomb Corp reported an operating income of 33.00M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

TEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tempus AI, Inc reported an operating income of -84.71M and revenue of 348.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -24.3%.

BLCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bausch + Lomb Corp reported a net income of -71.00M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of -5.7%.

TEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tempus AI, Inc reported a net income of -125.92M and revenue of 348.12M, resulting in a net margin of -36.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLCO and TEM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEM has higher volatility (16.88%) compared to BLCO (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCO dropped -48.07% vs TEM's -58.99%.

BLCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLCO and TEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer