BLCN vs. USPX
BLCN (Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF) and USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - BLCN tracks the Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index while USPX tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLCN returned -9.77%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for USPX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLCN charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for USPX.
Performance
BLCN vs. USPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLCN achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than USPX's 10.64% return.
BLCN
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 10.42%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- -9.77%
- 10Y*
- —
USPX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
BLCN vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF | 13.09% | -3.69% | 5.62% | 21.09% | -51.76% | 4.86% | 60.60% | 33.94% | -19.15% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 10.64% | 17.78% | 24.97% | 27.07% | -18.88% | 19.53% | 9.72% | 26.60% | -10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLCN and USPX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between BLCN and USPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BLCN vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLCN
USPX
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
BLCN
USPX
Industrials
BLCN
USPX
Financial Services
BLCN
USPX
Consumer Cyclical
BLCN
USPX
Basic Materials
BLCN
USPX
Utilities
BLCN
USPX
Communication Services
BLCN
USPX
Consumer Defensive
BLCN
-
USPX
Energy
BLCN
-
USPX
Healthcare
BLCN
-
USPX
Real Estate
BLCN
-
USPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLCN vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank
BLCN
USPX
BLCN vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLCN | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 2.28 | -1.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 3.12 | -1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.41 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 3.01 | -2.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.97 | 13.72 | -11.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLCN | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 2.28 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.77 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.80 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
BLCN vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLCN drawdown since its inception was -67.51%, which is greater than USPX's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCN and USPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLCN | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.51% | -31.21% | -36.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.53% | -9.15% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.26% | -19.21% | -26.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.51% | -24.60% | -42.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.11% | -0.75% | -44.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.29% | -4.44% | -25.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.82% | 2.00% | +11.82% |
Volatility
BLCN vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison
Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) has a higher volatility of 14.45% compared to Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) at 2.87%. This indicates that BLCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLCN | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.45% | 2.87% | +11.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.11% | 9.16% | +19.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.03% | 12.09% | +23.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.93% | 16.17% | +18.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.22% | 15.92% | +15.30% |
BLCN vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLCN has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLCN vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison
BLCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than USPX's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF | 2.66% | 3.01% | 0.67% | 0.54% | 1.28% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 1.45% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLCN and USPX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLCN has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to USPX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCN dropped -67.51% vs USPX's -31.21%.
On 5-year performance, USPX leads with 12.39% vs -9.77% for BLCN. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, USPX has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USPX has performed better with a 12.39% return vs -9.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BLCN.
BLCN has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.04% for USPX.
BLCN tracks Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index, while USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BLCN and 0.03% for USPX.
USPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLCN and USPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer