BLCN vs. NODE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BLCN (Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF) and NODE (VanEck Onchain Economy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index, while NODE is a Blockchain fund actively managed by VanEck. BLCN is passively managed, while NODE is actively managed. Over the past year, BLCN returned 18.72% vs 52.70% for NODE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLCN charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for NODE.

Performance

BLCN vs. NODE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCN achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly lower than NODE's 25.88% return.

BLCN

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 8.09%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: -10.30%
• 10Y*: —

NODE

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -5.30%
• YTD: 25.88%
• 6M: 20.78%
• 1Y: 52.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCN vs. NODE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF	8.09%	14.53%
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	25.88%	32.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCN and NODE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.57

The correlation between BLCN and NODE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BLCN vs. NODE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCN

BLCN Risk / Return Rank: 17
BLCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BLCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BLCN Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BLCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BLCN Martin Ratio Rank: 15

NODE

NODE Risk / Return Rank: 31
NODE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
NODE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
NODE Omega Ratio Rank: 32
NODE Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
NODE Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCN vs. NODE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLCN	NODE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	1.13	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	1.67	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.20	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	1.50	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.34	3.28	-1.94

BLCN vs. NODE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCN Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the NODE Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCN and NODE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLCN vs. NODE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCN drawdown since its inception was -67.51%, which is greater than NODE's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCN and NODE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCN	NODE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.51%	-35.35%	-32.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.53%	-35.35%	+5.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.54%	-7.83%	-39.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.40%	-10.98%	-19.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.00%	16.09%	-2.09%

Volatility

BLCN vs. NODE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) is 12.33%, while VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) has a volatility of 14.68%. This indicates that BLCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NODE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLCN	NODE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.33%	14.68%	-2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.23%	35.61%	-8.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.66%	46.99%	-10.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.22%	45.32%	-10.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.31%	45.32%	-14.01%

BLCN vs. NODE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCN has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than NODE's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCN vs. NODE - Dividend Comparison

BLCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than NODE's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF	2.67%	3.01%	0.67%	0.54%	1.28%	0.56%	0.58%	1.45%	1.16%
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	0.89%	1.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCN and NODE in my portfolio?

BLCN and NODE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLCN or NODE?

NODE has higher volatility (14.68%) compared to BLCN (12.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCN dropped -67.51% vs NODE's -35.35%.

Which ETF is better, BLCN or NODE?

On 1-year performance, NODE leads with 52.70% vs 18.72% for BLCN. On fees, BLCN is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BLCN has been the lower-risk option at 12.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLCN or NODE?

Over the 1-year period, NODE has performed better with a 52.70% return vs 18.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCN or NODE?

BLCN is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for NODE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLCN or NODE?

BLCN has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.89% for NODE.

What is the main difference between BLCN and NODE?

BLCN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NODE is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BLCN and 0.69% for NODE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NODE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.