PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKUI vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKUI vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKUI achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


BKUI

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKUI vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BKUI
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
1.43%4.93%5.50%5.75%-0.08%-0.26%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BKUI and UGA is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2021

-0.10

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BKUI and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKUI vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKUI
BKUI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BKUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKUI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BKUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKUI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKUI vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKUIUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+22.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.96

1.37

+4.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

32.16

5.37

+26.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

229.32

12.86

+216.46

BKUI vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKUI Sharpe Ratio is 10.45, which is higher than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKUI and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKUIUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45

2.27

+8.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.08

0.12

+5.97

Drawdowns

BKUI vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKUI drawdown since its inception was -1.72%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKUI and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKUIUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-86.59%

+84.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.13%

-14.88%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.25%

-26.68%

+26.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-14.75%

+14.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.27%

-36.76%

+36.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

6.20%

-6.18%

Volatility

BKUI vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) is 0.15%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that BKUI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKUIUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

11.64%

-11.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.31%

30.48%

-30.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41%

35.27%

-34.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.59%

34.40%

-33.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.59%

37.27%

-36.68%

BKUI vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKUI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKUI vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

BKUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BKUI
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
4.21%4.48%5.11%4.29%1.82%0.22%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKUI and UGA have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to BKUI (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKUI dropped -1.72% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 3-year performance, UGA leads with 20.80% vs 5.18% for BKUI. On fees, BKUI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, BKUI has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UGA has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKUI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

BKUI has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

BKUI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for BKUI and 0.75% for UGA.

BKUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.45 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKUI and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer