BKT vs. FDVV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BKT (BlackRock Income Trust) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both funds - BKT is a fund fund managed by BlackRock, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Over the past 5 years, BKT returned -2.80%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for FDVV. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKT charges 2.06%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.

Performance

BKT vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKT achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.92% return.

BKT

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: -0.95%
• 6M: -0.06%
• 1Y: 0.90%
• 3Y*: 4.09%
• 5Y*: -2.80%
• 10Y*: 1.23%

FDVV

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 8.92%
• 6M: 9.05%
• 1Y: 24.60%
• 3Y*: 20.55%
• 5Y*: 13.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKT vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKT BlackRock Income Trust	-0.95%	5.92%	3.33%	7.69%	-21.51%	-0.44%	7.36%	14.91%	-2.59%	2.58%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	8.92%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-1.26%	14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BKT and FDVV is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016	0.14

Over the past year, BKT and FDVV have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BKT vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKT

BKT Risk / Return Rank: 3
BKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BKT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BKT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 70
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKT vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKT	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	2.46	-2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	3.43	-3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.46	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	2.66	-2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.32	11.05	-10.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKT vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKT Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKT and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKT	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	2.46	-2.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	0.92	-1.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.80	-0.66

Drawdowns

BKT vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKT drawdown since its inception was -48.86%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKT and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKT	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.86%	-40.25%	-8.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.24%	-9.30%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.46%	-15.90%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.70%	-20.18%	-15.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.35%	-0.63%	-17.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-3.81%	-10.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	2.23%	+0.56%

Volatility

BKT vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) have volatilities of 2.97% and 3.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKT	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	3.12%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.90%	8.00%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.92%	10.04%	-3.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.21%	14.75%	-3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.73%	17.00%	-7.27%

BKT vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKT has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKT vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

BKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than FDVV's 2.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKT BlackRock Income Trust	10.05%	9.53%	9.19%	8.69%	8.35%	7.31%	6.80%	6.82%	6.48%	5.15%	5.09%	5.89%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.70%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKT and FDVV in my portfolio?

BKT and FDVV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKT or FDVV?

FDVV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to BKT (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKT dropped -48.86% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.