PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKPIX vs. UAPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKPIX vs. UAPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX) and ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund (UAPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKPIX achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than UAPIX's 41.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BKPIX having a 12.22% annualized return and UAPIX not far ahead at 12.46%.


BKPIX

1D
1.31%
1M
6.23%
YTD
11.96%
6M
7.74%
1Y
31.09%
3Y*
34.09%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
12.22%

UAPIX

1D
1.61%
1M
9.00%
YTD
41.12%
6M
34.49%
1Y
83.87%
3Y*
27.77%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
12.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKPIX vs. UAPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKPIX
ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund
11.96%11.57%28.64%9.95%-30.83%52.43%-30.69%55.99%-27.23%26.77%
UAPIX
ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund
41.12%12.77%10.42%22.26%-43.78%23.06%13.86%46.81%-26.88%24.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BKPIX and UAPIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001

0.73

The correlation between BKPIX and UAPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKPIX vs. UAPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKPIX
BKPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BKPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BKPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

UAPIX
UAPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UAPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
UAPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKPIX vs. UAPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX) and ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund (UAPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKPIXUAPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

3.96

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

13.47

-9.38

BKPIX vs. UAPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the UAPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKPIX and UAPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKPIX vs. UAPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKPIX drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, which is greater than UAPIX's maximum drawdown of -88.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKPIX and UAPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKPIXUAPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.22%

-88.51%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.69%

-22.32%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.94%

-49.86%

+11.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.71%

-61.82%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.21%

-72.18%

+5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.06%

0.00%

-43.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.06%

-35.98%

-20.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.72%

6.55%

+2.17%

Volatility

BKPIX vs. UAPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX) is 8.59%, while ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund (UAPIX) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that BKPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKPIXUAPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.59%

12.82%

-4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.54%

28.58%

-6.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.41%

39.46%

-7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.68%

45.31%

-4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.44%

46.63%

-3.19%

BKPIX vs. UAPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKPIX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than UAPIX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKPIX vs. UAPIX - Dividend Comparison

BKPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than UAPIX's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BKPIX
ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund
1.27%1.42%0.75%1.64%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.38%1.53%
UAPIX
ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund
0.33%0.47%1.06%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKPIX and UAPIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UAPIX has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to BKPIX (8.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKPIX dropped -96.22% vs UAPIX's -88.51%.

UAPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKPIX and UAPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer