PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAPIX vs. DXNLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UAPIX vs. DXNLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund (UAPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAPIX achieves a 34.82% return, which is significantly higher than DXNLX's 12.06% return.


UAPIX

1D
2.73%
1M
-3.87%
6M
22.23%
YTD
34.82%
1Y
71.71%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
10.24%
ALL TIME*
4.82%

DXNLX

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.32%
6M
10.68%
YTD
12.06%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

UAPIX vs. DXNLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UAPIX
ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund
34.82%12.77%10.42%22.26%-43.78%23.06%13.86%46.81%-26.88%24.36%
DXNLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund
12.06%22.13%28.56%66.63%-40.88%32.49%58.90%46.34%-3.37%37.37%

Correlation

The correlation between UAPIX and DXNLX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.68

The correlation between UAPIX and DXNLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UAPIX vs. DXNLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UAPIX
UAPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UAPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
UAPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DXNLX
DXNLX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DXNLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXNLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXNLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DXNLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXNLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UAPIX vs. DXNLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund (UAPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UAPIXDXNLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.41

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

4.48

+4.97

UAPIX vs. DXNLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the DXNLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAPIX and DXNLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UAPIX vs. DXNLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAPIX drawdown since its inception was -88.51%, which is greater than DXNLX's maximum drawdown of -43.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAPIX and DXNLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UAPIXDXNLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.51%

-43.77%

-44.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.32%

-15.91%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.86%

-28.35%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.82%

-43.77%

-18.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.70%

-10.69%

+4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.85%

-8.65%

-27.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

4.99%

+1.56%

Volatility

UAPIX vs. DXNLX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund (UAPIX) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX) at 6.96%. This indicates that UAPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXNLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UAPIXDXNLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

6.96%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.21%

19.44%

+8.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.79%

23.72%

+15.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.08%

28.79%

+16.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.46%

28.93%

+17.53%

UAPIX vs. DXNLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UAPIX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DXNLX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

UAPIX vs. DXNLX - Dividend Comparison

UAPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than DXNLX's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXNLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund
0.89%2.31%0.17%0.00%0.00%7.43%12.20%0.00%8.79%7.52%
UAPIX
ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund
0.35%0.47%1.06%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UAPIX and DXNLX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UAPIX has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to DXNLX (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAPIX dropped -88.51% vs DXNLX's -43.77%.

UAPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UAPIX and DXNLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer