BKMS vs. SCMB
BKMS (BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. BKMS is actively managed, while SCMB is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKMS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.
Performance
BKMS vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCMB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKMS vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 0.62% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMS and SCMB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMS vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank
BKMS
SCMB
BKMS vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMS | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.98 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
BKMS vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMS drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum SCMB drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMS and SCMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMS | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -6.13% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.79% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -1.32% | +1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility
BKMS vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMS | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 2.94% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.24% | 4.16% | -2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.24% | 4.16% | -2.92% |
BKMS vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMS vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison
BKMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than SCMB's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.53% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMS and SCMB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BKMS.
SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 1.11% for BKMS.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMS and 0.03% for SCMB.
Find the right allocation for BKMS and SCMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer