BKMS vs. MMMA
BKMS (BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF) and MMMA (NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
BKMS vs. MMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMMA
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 3.67%
- 6M
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKMS vs. MMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 0.79% |
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMS and MMMA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMS vs. MMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKMS vs. MMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMS drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum MMMA drawdown of -2.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMS and MMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMS | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -2.79% | +1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -0.55% | +0.29% |
Volatility
BKMS vs. MMMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMS | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22% | 4.03% | -2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.22% | 4.03% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.22% | 4.03% | -2.81% |
BKMS vs. MMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BKMS and MMMA have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
BKMS vs. MMMA - Dividend Comparison
BKMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than MMMA's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 1.11% | 0.00% |
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 1.95% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMS and MMMA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMS and MMMA have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
MMMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.11% for BKMS.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and NYLI.
Find the right allocation for BKMS and MMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer