BKMI vs. PDBC
BKMI (BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. BKMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
BKMI vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 36.23%
- 6M
- 36.27%
- 1Y
- 45.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
BKMI vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 0.26% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 31.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMI and PDBC is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMI vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
BKMI
PDBC
BKMI vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMI | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
BKMI vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMI drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMI and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMI | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -49.52% | +46.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -4.55% | +3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | -23.21% | +22.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.41% | — |
Volatility
BKMI vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMI | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88% | 18.61% | -15.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 19.12% | -16.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 17.78% | -14.90% |
BKMI vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMI vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
BKMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than PDBC's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.82% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMI and PDBC have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.98% for BKMI.
BKMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMI and 0.58% for PDBC.
Find the right allocation for BKMI and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer