BKMI vs. NANR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BKMI (BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF) and NANR (SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while NANR is a Natural Resources fund tracking the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. BKMI is actively managed, while NANR is passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

BKMI vs. NANR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BKMI

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NANR

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: -5.93%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 6M: 12.45%
• 1Y: 36.86%
• 3Y*: 18.00%
• 5Y*: 15.44%
• 10Y*: 11.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKMI vs. NANR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF	0.29%
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF	7.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BKMI and NANR is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026	0.10

Return for Risk

BKMI vs. NANR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NANR

NANR Risk / Return Rank: 64
NANR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NANR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
NANR Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NANR Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
NANR Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKMI vs. NANR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKMI	NANR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.94	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.50	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.64	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.39	—

Drawdowns

BKMI vs. NANR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMI drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum NANR drawdown of -49.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMI and NANR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKMI	NANR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-49.15%	+46.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	-10.16%	+8.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.16%	-8.39%	+7.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKMI	NANR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82%	19.13%	-16.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.82%	22.92%	-20.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.82%	23.59%	-20.77%

BKMI vs. NANR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BKMI and NANR have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

BKMI vs. NANR - Dividend Comparison

BKMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than NANR's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF	1.84%	1.77%	2.20%	2.78%	2.70%	2.61%	2.73%	2.02%	1.95%	1.83%	5.01%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKMI and NANR in my portfolio?

BKMI and NANR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKMI or NANR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKMI or NANR?

BKMI and NANR have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKMI or NANR?

NANR has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.98% for BKMI.

What is the main difference between BKMI and NANR?

BKMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while NANR is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and State Street.