BKMI vs. IBMN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BKMI (BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF) and IBMN (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. BKMI is actively managed, while IBMN is passively managed. BKMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMN.

Performance

BKMI vs. IBMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BKMI

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 1.20%
• 3Y*: 2.44%
• 5Y*: 0.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKMI vs. IBMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF	0.26%
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

BKMI vs. IBMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMN

IBMN Risk / Return Rank: 84
IBMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IBMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
IBMN Omega Ratio Rank: 93
IBMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
IBMN Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKMI vs. IBMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKMI	IBMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.58	-0.35

Drawdowns

BKMI vs. IBMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMI drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum IBMN drawdown of -12.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMI and IBMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKMI	IBMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-12.40%	+9.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.25%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-7.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	-0.05%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.17%	-1.81%	+0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKMI	IBMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88%	0.71%	+2.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.88%	1.80%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.88%	3.89%	-1.01%

BKMI vs. IBMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKMI vs. IBMN - Dividend Comparison

BKMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than IBMN's 1.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF	1.14%	2.03%	2.03%	1.72%	0.97%	0.70%	1.11%	1.65%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BKMI or IBMN?

On fees, IBMN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKMI or IBMN?

IBMN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BKMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKMI or IBMN?

IBMN has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.98% for BKMI.

What is the main difference between BKMI and IBMN?

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMI and 0.18% for IBMN.