BKMC vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BKMC tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index while QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index. Both are passively managed. BKMC charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

BKMC vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BKMC

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.34%
• 6M: 6.36%
• YTD: 11.65%
• 1Y: 19.28%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: 7.66%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.39%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	$1.12M	$1.07M	$1.01M
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BKMC vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	6.19%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

BKMC vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKMC	QQQN
Industrials	23.2%	8.7%
Technology	16.1%	47.3%
Financial Services	12.8%	-
Healthcare	12.3%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	13.7%
Real Estate	8.3%	-
Basic Materials	4.5%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	1.4%
Communication Services	3.3%	5.5%
Energy	3.1%	-
Utilities	2.3%	1.6%

Return for Risk

BKMC vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKMC

BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 49
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKMC vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKMC	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.81	—	—

Drawdowns

BKMC vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKMC	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.02%	0.00%	-25.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.30%	0.00%	-2.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	0.00%	-6.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKMC	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	0.00%	+15.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.80%	0.00%	+18.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.04%	0.00%	+19.04%

BKMC vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BKMC vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	1.42%	1.35%	1.54%	1.38%	1.63%	1.15%	0.86%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BKMC or QQQN?

On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKMC or QQQN?

BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKMC or QQQN?

BKMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between BKMC and QQQN?

BKMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKMC and 0.18% for QQQN.