PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKMC vs. QMID
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKMC vs. QMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKMC vs. QMID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BKMC
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
2.04%8.74%14.60%
QMID
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund
-4.14%5.02%9.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than QMID's -4.14% return.


BKMC

1D
0.78%
1M
-5.83%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.84%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*

QMID

1D
2.88%
1M
-7.04%
YTD
-4.14%
6M
-3.82%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKMC vs. QMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QMID's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKMC vs. QMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMC
BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

QMID
QMID Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKMC vs. QMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKMCQMIDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.36

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

0.68

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.09

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

0.60

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.37

2.40

+2.97

BKMC vs. QMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the QMID Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKMC and QMID, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKMCQMIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.36

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.24

+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between BKMC and QMID is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BKMC vs. QMID - Dividend Comparison

BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than QMID's 0.54% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BKMC
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
1.51%1.35%1.54%1.38%1.63%1.15%0.86%
QMID
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund
0.54%0.51%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BKMC vs. QMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, roughly equal to the maximum QMID drawdown of -24.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and QMID.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKMCQMIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.02%

-24.42%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-13.65%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.34%

-8.10%

+1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.68%

-5.63%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.44%

-0.10%

Volatility

BKMC vs. QMID - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) at 5.46%. This indicates that BKMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKMCQMIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

5.46%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

11.45%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.92%

20.55%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

18.84%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.28%

18.84%

+0.44%