BKMC vs. BKHY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and BKHY (BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while BKHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKMC returned 8.06%/yr vs 4.26%/yr for BKHY. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKMC charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for BKHY.

Performance

BKMC vs. BKHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than BKHY's 2.00% return.

BKMC

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 3.22%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 12.55%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 8.06%
• 10Y*: —

BKHY

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 7.78%
• 3Y*: 8.93%
• 5Y*: 4.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKMC vs. BKHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	11.69%	8.74%	13.78%	17.50%	-16.03%	23.83%	48.62%
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF	2.00%	8.48%	8.37%	12.40%	-10.97%	4.75%	17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BKMC and BKHY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020	0.70

The correlation between BKMC and BKHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BKMC vs. BKHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMC

BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 49
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

BKHY

BKHY Risk / Return Rank: 67
BKHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BKHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BKHY Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BKHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BKHY Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKMC vs. BKHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKMC	BKHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	2.12	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	3.21	-0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.43	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	3.07	-0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.72	14.14	-4.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKMC vs. BKHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the BKHY Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKMC and BKHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKMC	BKHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64	2.12	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.57	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.91	-0.08

Drawdowns

BKMC vs. BKHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, which is greater than BKHY's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and BKHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKMC	BKHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.02%	-15.89%	-9.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-2.53%	-7.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.68%	-4.87%	-18.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.02%	-15.89%	-9.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-2.98%	-3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	0.55%	+2.00%

Volatility

BKMC vs. BKHY - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that BKMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKMC	BKHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	1.13%	+3.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.97%	2.96%	+8.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.12%	3.68%	+11.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.77%	7.58%	+11.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.16%	7.37%	+11.79%

BKMC vs. BKHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BKHY's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BKMC vs. BKHY - Dividend Comparison

BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BKHY's 7.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF	7.44%	7.33%	7.34%	8.67%	6.59%	6.78%	4.65%
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	1.38%	1.35%	1.54%	1.38%	1.63%	1.15%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKMC and BKHY in my portfolio?

BKMC and BKHY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKMC or BKHY?

BKMC has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to BKHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKMC dropped -25.02% vs BKHY's -15.89%.

Which ETF is better, BKMC or BKHY?

On 5-year performance, BKMC leads with 8.06% vs 4.26% for BKHY. On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKMC or BKHY?

Over the 5-year period, BKMC has performed better with a 8.06% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKMC or BKHY?

BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for BKHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKMC or BKHY?

BKHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.44%, compared with 1.38% for BKMC.

What is the main difference between BKMC and BKHY?

BKMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BKHY is High Yield Bonds. BKMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while BKHY tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKMC and 0.22% for BKHY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.