PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLN vs. SEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLN vs. SEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLN achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than SEIX's 2.06% return.


BKLN

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.89%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
4.26%

SEIX

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.36%
YTD
2.06%
6M
2.65%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLN vs. SEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
0.16%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%2.99%
SEIX
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF
2.06%5.10%8.42%12.51%-1.77%5.49%3.17%3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLN and SEIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2019

0.29

Over the past year, BKLN and SEIX have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLN vs. SEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIX
SEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLN vs. SEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLNSEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.85

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

5.37

-3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

21.50

-15.38

BKLN vs. SEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the SEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLN and SEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLNSEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

3.77

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

1.97

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.23

-0.59

Drawdowns

BKLN vs. SEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLN drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, which is greater than SEIX's maximum drawdown of -17.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLN and SEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLNSEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-17.51%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-1.13%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.55%

-3.01%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.31%

-6.69%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.09%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-0.87%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.28%

+0.50%

Volatility

BKLN vs. SEIX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) has a higher volatility of 0.42% compared to Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX) at 0.34%. This indicates that BKLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLNSEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

0.34%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

1.29%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

1.61%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.47%

2.93%

+1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.43%

4.34%

+2.09%

BKLN vs. SEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKLN vs. SEIX - Dividend Comparison

BKLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, less than SEIX's 7.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.62%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
SEIX
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF
7.25%7.52%8.09%8.74%5.76%4.16%3.75%3.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKLN and SEIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKLN has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to SEIX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLN dropped -24.17% vs SEIX's -17.51%.

On 5-year performance, SEIX leads with 5.74% vs 5.14% for BKLN. On fees, SEIX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SEIX has performed better with a 5.74% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.

SEIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.25%, compared with 6.62% for BKLN.

BKLN is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SEIX is Bank Loan. BKLN tracks S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index, while SEIX tracks Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKLN and 0.57% for SEIX.

SEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.77 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLN and SEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer