PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLN vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLN vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLN achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.09% return.


BKLN

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.89%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
4.26%

OILK

1D
-1.91%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
61.09%
6M
56.40%
1Y
56.95%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
17.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLN vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
0.16%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
61.09%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLN and OILK is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.18

The correlation between BKLN and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKLN vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKLN
OILK

Technology

5.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
100.0%

Financial Services

1.9%

-

Industrials

0.9%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Communication Services

0.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

BKLN
5.7%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

BKLN
2.3%
OILK
100.0%

Financial Services

BKLN
1.9%
OILK

-

Industrials

BKLN
0.9%
OILK

-

Real Estate

BKLN
0.8%
OILK

-

Healthcare

BKLN
0.8%
OILK

-

Communication Services

BKLN
0.8%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

BKLN
0.7%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

BKLN

-

OILK

-

Energy

BKLN

-

OILK

-

Utilities

BKLN

-

OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLN vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLN vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLNOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.33

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.30

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

6.67

-0.55

BKLN vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLN and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLNOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.99

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.58

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.11

+0.53

Drawdowns

BKLN vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLN drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLN and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLNOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-83.76%

+59.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-17.35%

+14.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.55%

-23.42%

+19.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.31%

-34.69%

+27.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-5.49%

+5.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-32.60%

+31.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

8.57%

-7.79%

Volatility

BKLN vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) is 0.42%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that BKLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLNOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

10.52%

-10.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

23.32%

-20.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

28.82%

-26.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.47%

30.13%

-25.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.43%

35.97%

-29.54%

BKLN vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKLN vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

BKLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, less than OILK's 8.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.62%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.34%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKLN and OILK have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to BKLN (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLN dropped -24.17% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.28% vs 5.14% for BKLN. On fees, BKLN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BKLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 6.62% for BKLN.

BKLN is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while OILK is Oil & Gas. BKLN tracks S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKLN and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLN and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer