PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKIE vs. IPKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKIE vs. IPKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than IPKW's 6.08% return.


BKIE

1D
-0.89%
1M
3.12%
YTD
8.46%
6M
11.11%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*

IPKW

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.86%
YTD
6.08%
6M
9.96%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKIE vs. IPKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
8.46%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
6.08%45.50%10.56%15.12%-12.81%11.41%55.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BKIE and IPKW is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.88

The correlation between BKIE and IPKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKIE vs. IPKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKIE
IPKW

Financial Services

25.8%
32.3%

Industrials

18.6%
11.4%

Technology

10.1%
3.8%

Healthcare

9.1%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
15.8%

Basic Materials

7.2%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
0.4%

Energy

5.9%
21.4%

Communication Services

4.2%
6.3%

Utilities

3.7%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.1%

Financial Services

BKIE
25.8%
IPKW
32.3%

Industrials

BKIE
18.6%
IPKW
11.4%

Technology

BKIE
10.1%
IPKW
3.8%

Healthcare

BKIE
9.1%
IPKW
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BKIE
7.3%
IPKW
15.8%

Basic Materials

BKIE
7.2%
IPKW
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

BKIE
6.2%
IPKW
0.4%

Energy

BKIE
5.9%
IPKW
21.4%

Communication Services

BKIE
4.2%
IPKW
6.3%

Utilities

BKIE
3.7%
IPKW
3.5%

Real Estate

BKIE
2.0%
IPKW
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKIE vs. IPKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

IPKW
IPKW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IPKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPKW Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IPKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPKW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKIE vs. IPKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKIEIPKWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.87

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.68

9.91

-2.23

BKIE vs. IPKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the IPKW Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKIE and IPKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKIEIPKWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.84

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.54

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.60

+0.32

Drawdowns

BKIE vs. IPKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum IPKW drawdown of -47.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and IPKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKIEIPKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-47.24%

+19.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-9.14%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-17.77%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.19%

-33.18%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-2.45%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-9.00%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.64%

+0.31%

Volatility

BKIE vs. IPKW - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKIEIPKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.37%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

11.86%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

14.31%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

17.01%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

17.91%

-1.57%

BKIE vs. IPKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IPKW's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKIE vs. IPKW - Dividend Comparison

BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than IPKW's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.26%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.52%3.55%4.12%2.66%3.77%7.37%1.45%2.41%2.61%0.93%2.82%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKIE and IPKW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKIE has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to IPKW (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs IPKW's -47.24%.

On 5-year performance, IPKW leads with 9.19% vs 9.05% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IPKW has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IPKW.

IPKW has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 3.26% for BKIE.

BKIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IPKW is Global Equities. BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index, while IPKW tracks NASDAQ International BuyBack Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.55% for IPKW.

IPKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKIE and IPKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer