BKHY vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

BKHY (BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. BKHY is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, BKHY returned 6.34% vs 116.49% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. BKHY charges 0.22%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

BKHY vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKHY achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 8.06% return.

BKHY

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 1.71%
• YTD: 2.18%
• 1Y: 6.34%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: 3.95%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 15.85%
• 6M: 10.45%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 1Y: 116.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKHY vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF	2.18%	7.09%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	8.06%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BKHY and WNTR is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.41

Return for Risk

BKHY vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKHY

BKHY Risk / Return Rank: 70
BKHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BKHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
BKHY Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BKHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BKHY Martin Ratio Rank: 77

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 65
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKHY vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKHY	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.06	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	2.34	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.32	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	2.60	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.49	6.69	+4.80

BKHY vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKHY and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKHY vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKHY drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKHY and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKHY	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-42.65%	+26.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.53%	-42.65%	+40.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-11.84%	+11.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-20.57%	+17.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	16.58%	-16.03%

Volatility

BKHY vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) is 0.76%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that BKHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKHY	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.76%	18.80%	-18.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.03%	47.57%	-44.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.68%	53.81%	-50.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.59%	53.62%	-46.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.31%	53.62%	-46.31%

BKHY vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKHY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKHY vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

BKHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%, less than WNTR's 104.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF	7.52%	7.33%	7.34%	8.67%	6.59%	6.78%	4.65%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	104.11%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKHY and WNTR in my portfolio?

BKHY and WNTR have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKHY or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.80%) compared to BKHY (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKHY dropped -15.89% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, BKHY or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 116.49% vs 6.34% for BKHY. On fees, BKHY is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, BKHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKHY or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 116.49% return vs 6.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKHY or WNTR?

BKHY is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKHY or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 104.11%, compared with 7.52% for BKHY.

What is the main difference between BKHY and WNTR?

BKHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for BKHY and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.