PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKHY vs. HYEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKHY vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKHY achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than HYEM's 4.49% return.


BKHY

1D
0.32%
1M
0.19%
6M
1.77%
YTD
2.54%
1Y
5.76%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.55%

HYEM

1D
0.10%
1M
0.35%
6M
2.81%
YTD
4.49%
1Y
7.49%
3Y*
10.26%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.34%
ALL TIME*
4.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.29M$953.81K$870.21K
$2.00M$2.24M$4.33M

BKHY vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKHY
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF
2.54%8.48%8.37%12.40%-10.97%4.75%17.83%
HYEM
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
4.49%9.24%12.14%8.35%-13.39%-1.31%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BKHY and HYEM is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.56

The correlation between BKHY and HYEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKHY vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKHY
BKHY Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BKHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BKHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

HYEM
HYEM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HYEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKHY vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKHYHYEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.76

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

11.04

-0.76

BKHY vs. HYEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the HYEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKHY and HYEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKHY vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKHY drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum HYEM drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKHY and HYEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKHYHYEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-30.96%

+15.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

-2.73%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.87%

-5.23%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.89%

-26.29%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-4.35%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

0.68%

-0.12%

Volatility

BKHY vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) at 0.71%. This indicates that BKHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKHYHYEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.71%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

3.16%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

4.39%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.59%

7.50%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.28%

9.26%

-1.98%

BKHY vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKHY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKHY vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison

BKHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than HYEM's 6.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKHY
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF
7.41%7.33%7.34%8.67%6.59%6.78%4.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYEM
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.78%6.67%6.34%6.27%6.47%5.33%5.56%6.14%5.71%5.86%6.25%7.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKHY and HYEM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKHY has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to HYEM (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKHY dropped -15.89% vs HYEM's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, BKHY leads with 4.07% vs 3.17% for HYEM. On fees, BKHY is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, HYEM has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKHY has performed better with a 4.07% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKHY is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYEM.

BKHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 6.78% for HYEM.

BKHY tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index, while HYEM tracks ICE BofA Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for BKHY and 0.40% for HYEM.

HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKHY and HYEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer