PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKHY vs. BKAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKHY vs. BKAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKHY vs. BKAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKHY
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF
0.00%8.48%8.37%12.40%-10.97%4.75%17.83%
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
0.30%7.23%1.17%5.67%-13.29%-1.46%2.15%

Returns By Period


BKHY

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
0.00%
6M
1.02%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*

BKAG

1D
0.14%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.89%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKHY vs. BKAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKHY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than BKAG's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BKHY vs. BKAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKHY
BKHY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BKHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BKHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BKAG
BKAG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BKAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BKAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKAG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKHY vs. BKAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKHYBKAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

0.99

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

1.38

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.67

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.91

4.63

+4.28

BKHY vs. BKAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the BKAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKHY and BKAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKHYBKAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.99

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.04

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.01

+0.86

Correlation

The correlation between BKHY and BKAG is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BKHY vs. BKAG - Dividend Comparison

BKHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than BKAG's 4.26% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BKHY
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF
7.73%7.33%7.34%8.67%6.59%6.78%4.65%
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
4.26%4.17%4.26%3.33%2.49%1.55%1.16%

Drawdowns

BKHY vs. BKAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKHY drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum BKAG drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKHY and BKAG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKHYBKAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-18.53%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-2.51%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.89%

-18.00%

+2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-2.31%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-7.26%

+4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.90%

-0.07%

Volatility

BKHY vs. BKAG - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) at 1.73%. This indicates that BKHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKHYBKAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

1.73%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

2.70%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.80%

4.36%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.56%

5.99%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.44%

5.59%

+1.85%