BKHY vs. BEDY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BKHY (BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF) and BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index, while BEDY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. BKHY is passively managed, while BEDY is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKHY charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BEDY.

Performance

BKHY vs. BEDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKHY achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than BEDY's 11.63% return.

BKHY

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 7.19%
• 3Y*: 8.93%
• 5Y*: 4.19%
• 10Y*: —

BEDY

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: 11.63%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKHY vs. BEDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF	1.83%	0.59%
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	11.63%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BKHY and BEDY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

BKHY vs. BEDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKHY

BKHY Risk / Return Rank: 64
BKHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BKHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
BKHY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
BKHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BKHY Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKHY vs. BEDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKHY	BEDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKHY	BEDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	2.48	-1.58

Drawdowns

BKHY vs. BEDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKHY drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, which is greater than BEDY's maximum drawdown of -6.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKHY and BEDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKHY	BEDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-6.25%	-9.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	0.00%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-1.35%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKHY	BEDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.69%	12.02%	-8.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.58%	12.02%	-4.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.36%	12.02%	-4.66%

BKHY vs. BEDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKHY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDY's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKHY vs. BEDY - Dividend Comparison

BKHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than BEDY's 3.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	3.32%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF	7.46%	7.33%	7.34%	8.67%	6.59%	6.78%	4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKHY and BEDY in my portfolio?

BKHY and BEDY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKHY or BEDY?

On fees, BKHY is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKHY or BEDY?

BKHY is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BEDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKHY or BEDY?

BKHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 3.32% for BEDY.

What is the main difference between BKHY and BEDY?

BKHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BEDY is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for BKHY and 0.50% for BEDY.