PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKH vs. TNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BKH vs. TNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Black Hills Corporation (BKH) and Tennant Company (TNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKH achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than TNC's 17.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BKH having a 5.65% annualized return and TNC not far behind at 5.49%.


BKH

1D
2.63%
1M
4.78%
6M
8.39%
YTD
10.42%
1Y
37.47%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
5.65%

TNC

1D
0.32%
1M
-2.26%
6M
9.83%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
5.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKH vs. TNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKH
Black Hills Corporation
10.42%23.93%13.57%-19.95%3.08%18.86%-19.05%28.60%7.98%0.81%
TNC
Tennant Company
17.07%-8.22%-11.03%52.62%-22.84%16.87%-8.78%51.57%-27.40%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BKH and TNC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1992

0.28

The correlation between BKH and TNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BKH:

$5.73B

TNC:

$1.46B

EPS

BKH:

$2.08

TNC:

$1.70

PE Ratio

BKH:

36.17

TNC:

50.33

PS Ratio

BKH:

2.46

TNC:

1.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

BKH:

$2.29B

TNC:

$1.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BKH:

$596.90M

TNC:

$477.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

BKH:

$554.70M

TNC:

$97.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKH vs. TNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKH
BKH Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKH Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

TNC
TNC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKH vs. TNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Hills Corporation (BKH) and Tennant Company (TNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKHTNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.07

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

0.17

+3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

0.44

+9.53

BKH vs. TNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKH Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the TNC Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKH and TNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKH vs. TNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKH drawdown since its inception was -65.72%, smaller than the maximum TNC drawdown of -83.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKH and TNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKHTNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.72%

-83.81%

+18.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.94%

-27.71%

+16.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.24%

-48.98%

+27.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.98%

-48.98%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.45%

-48.98%

+8.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-28.09%

+26.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-16.88%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

10.54%

-6.91%

Volatility

BKH vs. TNC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Black Hills Corporation (BKH) is 8.41%, while Tennant Company (TNC) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that BKH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKHTNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

9.42%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.95%

33.55%

-15.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.47%

35.71%

-13.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.43%

29.59%

-7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.57%

32.15%

-6.58%

Dividends

BKH vs. TNC - Dividend Comparison

BKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than TNC's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKH
Black Hills Corporation
3.67%3.90%4.44%4.63%3.43%3.25%3.53%2.61%3.07%3.01%2.74%3.49%
TNC
Tennant Company
1.43%1.62%1.39%1.16%1.65%1.16%1.27%1.13%1.63%1.16%1.14%1.42%

Financials

BKH vs. TNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Black Hills Corporation and Tennant Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
780.70M
297.90M
(BKH) Total Revenue
(TNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BKH vs. TNC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Black Hills Corporation and Tennant Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
38.1%
Portfolio components
BKH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 780.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tennant Company reported a gross profit of 113.60M and revenue of 297.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.

BKH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported an operating income of 201.90M and revenue of 780.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.9%.

TNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tennant Company reported an operating income of 4.90M and revenue of 297.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

BKH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported a net income of -2.10M and revenue of 780.70M, resulting in a net margin of -0.3%.

TNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tennant Company reported a net income of 200.00K and revenue of 297.90M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BKH and TNC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNC has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to BKH (8.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKH dropped -65.72% vs TNC's -83.81%.

BKH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKH and TNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer