PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKH vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BKH vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Black Hills Corporation (BKH) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BKH having a 10.42% return and ABBV slightly lower at 10.36%. Over the past 10 years, BKH has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 5.65%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.05% annualized return.


BKH

1D
2.63%
1M
4.78%
6M
8.39%
YTD
10.42%
1Y
37.47%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
5.65%

ABBV

1D
-0.73%
1M
10.37%
6M
14.57%
YTD
10.36%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
26.78%
5Y*
20.75%
10Y*
19.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKH vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKH
Black Hills Corporation
10.42%23.93%13.57%-19.95%3.08%18.86%-19.05%28.60%7.98%0.81%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
10.36%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BKH and ABBV is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BKH:

$5.73B

ABBV:

$438.31B

EPS

BKH:

$2.08

ABBV:

$2.05

PE Ratio

BKH:

36.17

ABBV:

120.89

PS Ratio

BKH:

2.46

ABBV:

7.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

BKH:

$2.29B

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BKH:

$596.90M

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

BKH:

$554.70M

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKH vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKH
BKH Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKH Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKH vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Hills Corporation (BKH) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKHABBVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.82

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

4.04

+5.93

BKH vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKH Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKH and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKH vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKH drawdown since its inception was -65.72%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKH and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKHABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.72%

-45.09%

-20.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.94%

-17.32%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.24%

-20.74%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.98%

-21.92%

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.45%

-45.09%

+4.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-4.98%

+3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-10.67%

-5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

7.79%

-4.16%

Volatility

BKH vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Black Hills Corporation (BKH) is 8.41%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that BKH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKHABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

10.48%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.95%

19.44%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.47%

25.92%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.43%

23.32%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.57%

25.87%

-0.30%

Dividends

BKH vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

BKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than ABBV's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
2.72%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
BKH
Black Hills Corporation
3.67%3.90%4.44%4.63%3.43%3.25%3.53%2.61%3.07%3.01%2.74%3.49%

Financials

BKH vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Black Hills Corporation and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
780.70M
15.00B
(BKH) Total Revenue
(ABBV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BKH vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Black Hills Corporation and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
83.5%
Portfolio components
BKH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 780.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

BKH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported an operating income of 201.90M and revenue of 780.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.9%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

BKH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported a net income of -2.10M and revenue of 780.70M, resulting in a net margin of -0.3%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BKH and ABBV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABBV has higher volatility (10.48%) compared to BKH (8.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKH dropped -65.72% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

BKH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKH and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer