BKGI vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BDGS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bridges. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKGI returned 22.31%/yr vs 14.17%/yr for BDGS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKGI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

BKGI vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKGI achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.94% return.

BKGI

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 12.69%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 21.83%
• 3Y*: 22.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 5.94%
• 6M: 5.90%
• 1Y: 14.42%
• 3Y*: 14.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKGI vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	12.69%	37.53%	12.35%	1.87%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.94%	10.61%	19.07%	8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BKGI and BDGS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.27

The correlation between BKGI and BDGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKGI vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKGI	BDGS
Utilities	49.3%	1.9%
Energy	21.6%	2.6%
Industrials	14.0%	6.6%
Real Estate	11.5%	1.5%
Communication Services	3.5%	16.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.1%
Financial Services	-	9.3%
Healthcare	-	7.5%
Technology	-	37.4%

Return for Risk

BKGI vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 61
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 67

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 78
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKGI vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKGI	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.39	-0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	3.54	-0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.50	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	3.67	+0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.47	17.59	-5.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKGI vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKGI and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKGI	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	2.39	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	1.77	-0.15

Drawdowns

BKGI vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKGI drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKGI and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKGI	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.79%	-9.12%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.16%	-4.03%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.16%	-9.12%	-5.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	-0.54%	-2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.56%	-0.64%	-1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	0.84%	+1.03%

Volatility

BKGI vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.09%. This indicates that BKGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKGI	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	1.09%	+3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	4.73%	+4.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.63%	6.08%	+5.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.08%	8.21%	+5.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.08%	8.21%	+5.87%

BKGI vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKGI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKGI vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

BKGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.68%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKGI and BDGS in my portfolio?

BKGI and BDGS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKGI or BDGS?

BKGI has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to BDGS (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKGI dropped -14.79% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, BKGI or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, BKGI leads with 22.31% vs 14.17% for BDGS. On fees, BKGI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKGI or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, BKGI has performed better with a 22.31% return vs 14.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKGI or BDGS?

BKGI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKGI or BDGS?

BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between BKGI and BDGS?

BKGI is categorized as Energy Equities, while BDGS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKGI and 0.85% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.