BKFI vs. OILT
BKFI (BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF) and OILT (Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKFI is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while OILT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Texas Weighted Oil and Gas Index - Benchmark TR Gross. BKFI is actively managed, while OILT is passively managed. Their -0.46 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BKFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for OILT.
Performance
BKFI vs. OILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKFI
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
OILT
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 20.92%
- YTD
- 34.17%
- 1Y
- 41.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $291.85K | $607.01K | $1.20M | |
| $81.32K | $66.65K | $96.97K |
BKFI vs. OILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | -1.23% |
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 33.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKFI and OILT is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKFI vs. OILT — Risk / Return Rank
BKFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OILT
BKFI vs. OILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKFI | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKFI vs. OILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum OILT drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and OILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKFI | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -35.21% | +32.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -9.45% | +6.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -13.02% | +11.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.97% | — |
Volatility
BKFI vs. OILT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKFI | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 28.10% | -23.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 28.73% | -24.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 28.73% | -24.55% |
BKFI vs. OILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than OILT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKFI vs. OILT - Dividend Comparison
BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than OILT's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 2.55% | 3.12% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKFI and OILT have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OILT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OILT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BKFI.
OILT has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.17% for BKFI.
BKFI is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while OILT is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 0.35% for OILT.
Find the right allocation for BKFI and OILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer