BKF vs. RNEM

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BKF (iShares MSCI BRIC ETF) and RNEM (First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - BKF tracks the MSCI BRIC Index while RNEM tracks the Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKF returned -3.51%/yr vs 4.97%/yr for RNEM. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKF charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RNEM.

Performance

BKF vs. RNEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKF achieves a -8.67% return, which is significantly lower than RNEM's 0.93% return.

BKF

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: -11.29%
• YTD: -8.67%
• 1Y: -2.04%
• 3Y*: 6.12%
• 5Y*: -3.51%
• 10Y*: 4.28%

RNEM

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: -0.70%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: 6.27%
• 5Y*: 4.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKF vs. RNEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKF iShares MSCI BRIC ETF	-8.67%	22.30%	9.24%	1.27%	-21.78%	-11.87%	16.52%	22.93%	-13.80%	20.56%
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	0.93%	15.58%	-1.47%	23.43%	-8.75%	6.16%	-8.16%	12.76%	-9.34%	11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BKF and RNEM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017	0.65

The correlation between BKF and RNEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKF vs. RNEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKF	RNEM
Financial Services	23.9%	35.0%
Consumer Cyclical	18.4%	9.9%
Communication Services	12.3%	8.7%
Technology	9.6%	6.4%
Basic Materials	7.6%	14.2%
Industrials	7.5%	3.9%
Energy	6.9%	7.0%
Healthcare	5.0%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	6.0%
Utilities	3.7%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.8%

Return for Risk

BKF vs. RNEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKF

BKF Risk / Return Rank: 8
BKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BKF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
BKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BKF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

RNEM

RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 14
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 13
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKF vs. RNEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKF	RNEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	0.30	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	0.52	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.06	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	0.35	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.30	0.95	-1.25

BKF vs. RNEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKF Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the RNEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKF and RNEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKF vs. RNEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKF drawdown since its inception was -70.29%, which is greater than RNEM's maximum drawdown of -38.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKF and RNEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKF	RNEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.29%	-38.38%	-31.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.45%	-10.71%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.60%	-13.09%	-5.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.97%	-21.41%	-20.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.03%	-5.17%	-20.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.10%	-9.26%	-18.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.79%	4.00%	+2.79%

Volatility

BKF vs. RNEM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) at 3.35%. This indicates that BKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKF	RNEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	3.35%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.94%	10.95%	+1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	12.51%	+3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.53%	14.48%	+7.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.67%	17.18%	+4.49%

BKF vs. RNEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKF has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than RNEM's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKF vs. RNEM - Dividend Comparison

BKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than RNEM's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKF iShares MSCI BRIC ETF	1.59%	1.79%	2.37%	1.68%	2.04%	2.93%	1.02%	1.66%	2.33%	1.51%	1.82%	3.15%
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	2.35%	2.75%	3.45%	1.63%	2.99%	3.20%	3.01%	2.85%	2.85%	2.28%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKF and RNEM in my portfolio?

BKF and RNEM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKF or RNEM?

BKF has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to RNEM (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKF dropped -70.29% vs RNEM's -38.38%.

Which ETF is better, BKF or RNEM?

On 5-year performance, RNEM leads with 4.97% vs -3.51% for BKF. On fees, BKF is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, RNEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKF or RNEM?

Over the 5-year period, RNEM has performed better with a 4.97% return vs -3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKF or RNEM?

BKF is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKF or RNEM?

RNEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.59% for BKF.

What is the main difference between BKF and RNEM?

BKF tracks MSCI BRIC Index, while RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BKF and 0.75% for RNEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.